opaqueice Wrote: > You persist in trying to draw this artificial distinction. I'm tired of > arguing about it, so I'll just say this once more: > > if you correctly hear a difference X times out of Y attempts, you will > have provided evidence for (or against, depending on X/Y) for the > assertion that there is a difference. You will NOT have proven > anything, either way. > > In any case, why not just try it? Aren't you curious?
Artificial distinction? There is nothing "artificial" in understanding logic. Sure, I'm interested, but at the moment I have cloth-ears due to a cold. I'm also reluctant to involve people in helping out with A/B'ing. (And I hardly have time to even listen at the moment -let alone A/B.) -- P Floding ------------------------------------------------------------------------ P Floding's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2932 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=22936 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
