sleepysurf Wrote: 
> Well, I spent a couple hours investigating this further tonight.  In a
> nutshell... RANDOM result.  
> 

Thanks for the update, sleepysurf!  It did seem a bit hard to believe
that the difference could be so big.

As you point out it's also a good lesson in statistics - two positive
trials really aren't enough, but when we're expecting to find something
we tend to seize on positive evidence immediately (whereas faced with
negative evidence we might just re-do the test).  This is exactly why
blind tests, with enough trials, are the only way to decide if this
effect is audible to anyone.


-- 
opaqueice
------------------------------------------------------------------------
opaqueice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4234
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=26332

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to