I feel somewhat the same about tact. Something along the lines I mentioned above would be more likely for me, ie, sb3->deq->dac w/wordclock out->probably some kind of ucd based amp.
I'm hoping that the speakers are salvageable for me, but we'll have to see. I have seen people mention sibilance problems with the sb3. Was this a canard, or does it seem to be a real problem? regards, t highdudgeon;134041 Wrote: > I'll be totally honest with you -- and, YMMV, because this is > subjective: I think there are better things out there than TacT and > that, quite possibly, the things amp (which is a DAC) might be a weak > point. > > I would first deal with 1) room and 2) EQ. Then, think long and hard > about your speakers, if you're still not satisfied. THEN look toward > DACs and that sort of thing. In my book, that's about refinement; you > want to get the basics first. -- totoro _____________________________________________ squeezebox 3 -> behringer 2496 -> classe 5 -> mccormack dna .5 -> audio physic tempo 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ totoro's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5935 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=26306 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
