Sleestack;160314 Wrote: 
> Nothing I said would contradict that.  Nevertheless, I also said I
> thought it might be because the North Star upsamples.  North Star isn't
> going anywhere, b/c I do continue to want a CD transport in my 2.2.
> system.  I'm too lazy to promptly burn my CDs when I get new one.  I
> only have 500 CDs in FLAC right now.  I have 500 more CDs (and growing)
> to go.  Esoteric is also going nowhere, b/c that's an entirely different
> set of devices.

You said:

"Ever since I got my Transporters, they are the only transports that
have been used with my TACT based systems."

Hence, I thought you were no longer using the Aberdeen Northstar.

The fact that you plan to keep your Northstar and Esoteric transports,
IMO, proves the reviewer's commments:

"The Slim Devices Transporter marks a shift in the way we audiophiles
play music, and I believe it signals the death of the CD transport. In
fact, I think someone would be foolish to spend much money on a CD
transport today."

are wrong. 

Audiophiles will continue buy and use CD transports.

I don't run home and rip every new CD I buy. I can't imagine being
without a transport.


-- 
jhm731
------------------------------------------------------------------------
jhm731's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7685
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=30243

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to