I just reread the thread in question, and have to disagree with you , skunk, if you are asserting the soapboxing was all on the dbt side (primarily me and opaqueice).
The slide into that debate was initiated by garyb's remark that it was "amazingly unscientific" to make a judgement on a claim without any "experimental work" (NB:he didn't provide any valid experiments to support his position, in any event). That got the ball rolling. I saw just as much "soapboxing" on the other side: it wasn't as if one side was posting and the other wasn't. You seem to be asserting that we should have rolled over. We didn't and neither did garyb or philinny. Why should we have (and, conversely, I don't see why they should have, either)? Why were we getting on a soapbox while they weren't? Sorry, I just don't buy it, and I don't think the record supports it. -- totoro squeezebox 3 -> mccormack dna .5 -> audio physic tempo 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ totoro's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5935 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32352 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
