tomjtx;204500 Wrote: > I would hasten to add, Patrick, that your advertising and marketing has > ,IMO, always been on the up and up and I would far rather audition an > SB+ than those reference audio guys. :-)
Yeah I still haven't posted any real review of my SB+, as I'm just enjoying listening to it! It sounds great - much better even than my CD player. Good enough that I basically consider the source question solved for many years to come. I'm always a bit sceptical of modders where they just put in more expensive components (like the basic Ref Audio mods). The TP doesn't have cheap parts inside, and replacing a £1 op-amp with a £2 one is surely something that SD tried and rejected. Where they change things more dramatically - their advanced TP mods totally take out the analogue stage - I'm kinda happier, but wonder why they start with a TP - you may as well start with a SB3, as all you're using it for is the system of getting your sound files across, plus the screen(s). Using the TP as a base strikes me as an expensive extra screen and knob! Adam -- adamslim Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others http://www.last.fm/user/AdamSlim/ 'Last.fm group: people who don't listen to any of last.fm's top artists' (http://www.last.fm/group/People+who+don%27t+listen+to+any+of+last.fm%27s+top+artists) SB+, EAR 859, Living Voice Auditorium II plus some other stuff SB3, Shek d2, Ming-Da MC84-C, Harbeth HL-P3ES ------------------------------------------------------------------------ adamslim's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7355 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=35505
_______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
