seanadams;274347 Wrote: > Unless they're testing a conventional S/PDIF DAC, then yes the results > are complete nonsense.
I recall an English magazine providing a quite unfavorable review to the Transporter, I do not believe very much in some of those magazines, I believe that possibly one of the backgrounders could be that they tested jitter rejection to be quite unfavorable, and I wouldn't be surprised if some of those guys actually don't listen that much.... but provide favorable reviews to those who provide the most advertising money and possibly they rely way too much on on measurements..... I'm not 100% sure which magazine this was, I believe it was "What Hi-Fi". I would probably believe from your statement that everything they provided would be just plain rubbish.... "Or perhaps You are more polished / polite in your statements" A bad review from any magazine would never stop me from buying anything anyways.... Could you possibly provide some backgroundes as to why the Transaporter measures well everywhere and then suddenly quite poor in another review? (Of course you wouldn't be able to figure out what the h.... those guys have done) I don't believe in measurements anyway... I believe in my ears, just wanted to know about this..... Regards Harald N -- haraldo Suse Linux Enterprise Desktop / SC7 -> SB3 -> Benchmark DAC1 -> Krell KAV400xi -> Meadowlark Kestrel2 / Duntech PCL-15 Everything is difficult before it's easy ------------------------------------------------------------------------ haraldo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13472 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=43976 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
