Josh Coalson;187979 Wrote: > I *hope* that's not the reason Linn went with WMAL instead of FLAC! are > the tracks DRMed? > > anyway I am considering using one of the reserved codes (there are 3 > left) in the frame header for 88.2KHz and letting it be in the subset. > as far as FLAC is concerned the sample rate makes no difference to > anything, it's just a number. the constrained set is mainly a > concession to hardware makers to not have to support every oddball rate > to be subset compliant. also in 1999, I didn't really know how things > would shake out with regards to what rates would be common. > > Josh
Josh, you might consider adding 176.4KHz also. Reference Recordings will soon be offering files at that sample rate. Currently they send the files as WAVs on a DVD-R disc, but they plan to offer FLAC downloads in the future: http://www.stereophile.com/news/010508ref/ Thank you for your excellent work on the FLAC format, BTW. -- Pale Blue Ego ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Pale Blue Ego's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=110 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32951 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
