Phil Leigh;421481 Wrote: > Well, they would if anyone gave a flying stuff about 24/192! - > completely pointless. Even 24/96 is pointless for domestic replay. I've > yet to meet anyone who can tell the difference between 24/96 and 24/48 > downsampled properly...
I agree that 24/192 might be overkill, but there -are- countless DAC's which support it, plus an increasing number of tracks available at that resolution. I'd certainly like to have the -chance- to hear some in my setup, and decide if they're worth it. I've read comments in various other forums that 24/96 is clearly a step up from Redbook, but again, haven't been able to compare them to 24/48 in my setup. -- sleepysurf main system: sb2 (with elpac linear psu) > benchmark dac-1 > modwright swl 9.0se > belles 350a reference > ml summits. audience au24e and blue jeans cables. secondary systems: sb3 in master br (russound r235ls amp driving in-ceiling speaker) and game room (powered swan s200a speakers), with boom in home office. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ sleepysurf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=62848 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
