cliveb wrote: > Sorry, it's not completely clear to me what you're implying here. I > *think* you seem to be saying that anyone who questions whether jitter > has an audible effect must be wrong. > > I am aware of two properly conducted listening tests where the audible > effects of jitter were assessed: > > Benjamin & Gannon. > Theoretical and audible effects of jitter on digital audio quality. > 105th AES Convention, 1998 > Jitter added to digital signal between transport and DAC with a > hardware device. > Conclusions: uncorrelated jitter inaudible below 10nS rms on pure > tones; > uncorrelated jitter inaudible below 20nS rms on music > signal > > Ashihara, Kiryu et al. > Detection threshold for distortions due to jitter on digital audio. > Acoust. Sci. & Tech. 26, 1 (2005) > Jitter simulated in the digital domain. > Conclusions: uncorrelated jitter inaudible below 250nS on music > signal. > > Both of these trials would tend to support Ethan Winer's viewpoint.
Both shall probably clean their ears;) how about this by John Westlake? http://www.pinkfishmedia.net/forum/showthread.php?p=1801315#post1801315 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ michael123's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23745 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96475 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
