JJZolx wrote: > Most audiophiles think ABX testing is worthless. Why would they want to > ABX these samples? It's like telling an atheist to try praying to some > god or another and seeing if they get any results. I already had one person that was convinced it is easy to spot a difference and on the first sample he already got pretty confused :)
JJZolx wrote: > I'm also not sure what exactly the point would be of encoding them both > at 24/96 when many people think that the 96 kHz encoding itself is > detrimental to sound quality. That includes many audiophiles who prefer > 44.1 kHz. First comes bit-depth, on judgement day comes samplerate and then we rule the world!! JJZolx wrote: > Good luck with this test. I imagine you'll get quite a few people who > are already convinced that hi-res audio is a scam and will come back and > confirm to you there's absolutely no difference. Did you enter your results to the survey? Transporter (modded) -> RG142 -> Avantgarde Acoustic based 500VA monoblocks -> Sommer SPK240 -> self-made speakers ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Wombat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4113 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=101386 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
