Julf wrote: 
> To quote yourself:
> 
> 
> 
> If you go back to the beginning of the thread, you'll notice that after
> some light-hearted joking not directed at anyone specific, and some
> fact-based and balanced responses, there was this one:
> 
> 
> 
> That was the point where things went downhill.
> 
> 
> 
> Perhaps a case of 'projection'
> (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection)?

The golden rear comment was obviously a joke.

Who in their right mind would be offended by that our take that
serious?

Another weak attempt to point the finger. Face it your attacks were
unjustified, and yes they were attacks. Bottom line is people have the
right to voice their opinion on their on subjective perception. Which
was my optional post.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
edwardthern's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=66099
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106575

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to