On 2024-12-06 10:00, Ricardo Robaina wrote: > On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 9:22 PM Paul Moore <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Yes, Richard did provide a reviewed-by tag on the v1 patch, but v2 has > > enough changes that I don't think we can reasonably carry that forward; > > of course Richard re-review this iteration and provide a new tag. I'm > > going to remove it for now. > > > > Al never provided an explicit reviewed-by tag; simply commenting on a > > patch is not the same as providing a 'Reviewed-by', the reviewer will > > provide an explicit 'Reviewed-by' tag in their email. I'm going to > > remove Al's tag too. > > I'm sorry about that, I was just trying to give credit to the ones who > helped. Thanks for clarifying the expected review process, I > appreciate it!
Please re-add my reviewed-by tag. > > Other than those issues, I think this looks much better than v1, I'm > > going to merge this into audit/dev now, thanks! > > Thanks, Paul! > > - Ricardo - RGB -- Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]> Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada Upstream IRC: SunRaycer Voice: +1.613.860 2354 SMS: +1.613.518.6570
