On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 02:36:47PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> No callers of kern_path_locked() or user_path_locked_at() want a
> negative dentry.  So change them to return -ENOENT instead.  This
> simplifies callers.
> 
> This results in a subtle change to bcachefs in that an ioctl will now
> return -ENOENT in preference to -EXDEV.  I believe this restores the
> behaviour to what it was prior to

I'm not following how the code change matches the commit message?

>  Commit bbe6a7c899e7 ("bch2_ioctl_subvolume_destroy(): fix locking")
> 
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <[email protected]>
> ---
> diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/fs-ioctl.c b/fs/bcachefs/fs-ioctl.c
> index 15725b4ce393..595b57fabc9a 100644
> --- a/fs/bcachefs/fs-ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/bcachefs/fs-ioctl.c
> @@ -511,10 +511,6 @@ static long bch2_ioctl_subvolume_destroy(struct bch_fs 
> *c, struct file *filp,
>               ret = -EXDEV;
>               goto err;
>       }
> -     if (!d_is_positive(victim)) {
> -             ret = -ENOENT;
> -             goto err;
> -     }
>       ret = __bch2_unlink(dir, victim, true);
>       if (!ret) {
>               fsnotify_rmdir(dir, victim);

Reply via email to