... so don't use __getname() there. Switch it (and ntfs_d_hash(), while we are at it) to kmalloc(PATH_MAX, GFP_NOWAIT). Yes, ntfs_d_hash() almost certainly can do with smaller allocations, but let ntfs folks deal with that - keep the allocation size as-is for now.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]> --- fs/ntfs3/namei.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ntfs3/namei.c b/fs/ntfs3/namei.c index 82c8ae56beee..ab96290ee6d9 100644 --- a/fs/ntfs3/namei.c +++ b/fs/ntfs3/namei.c @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ static int ntfs_d_hash(const struct dentry *dentry, struct qstr *name) /* * Try slow way with current upcase table */ - uni = kmem_cache_alloc(names_cachep, GFP_NOWAIT); + uni = kmalloc(PATH_MAX, GFP_NOWAIT); if (!uni) return -ENOMEM; @@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static int ntfs_d_hash(const struct dentry *dentry, struct qstr *name) err = 0; out: - kmem_cache_free(names_cachep, uni); + kfree(uni); return err; } @@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ static int ntfs_d_compare(const struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int len1, * Try slow way with current upcase table */ sbi = dentry->d_sb->s_fs_info; - uni1 = __getname(); + uni1 = kmalloc(PATH_MAX, GFP_NOWAIT); if (!uni1) return -ENOMEM; @@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ static int ntfs_d_compare(const struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int len1, ret = !ntfs_cmp_names_cpu(uni1, uni2, sbi->upcase, false) ? 0 : 1; out: - __putname(uni1); + kfree(uni1); return ret; } -- 2.47.3
