Hi Ryan, Ryan Jud Hughes: > It seems that aufs's unionctl wants a command like: > unionctl /UNION --mode /foo ro > > whereas unionfs's wanted a command like: > unionctl /UNION --mode ro /foo ::: > Is there any reason not to do this?
Because unionctl.c in unionfs-1.4.tar.gz shows us, fprintf(stderr, "\tunionctl UNION --mode BRANCH (rw|ro|nfsro)\n"); Unionfs-unionctl may accept the both cases. Junjiro Okajima ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/