sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> You may say "cannot remount ext3 readwrite anymore". It is related to
> my question in previous mail.
>
>
> > > > I got another question in my mind.
> > > > At the end of your rsync script,
> > > > mount -o remount,ro ${LOWER_BRANCH}
> > > > Why didn't this remount return an error?
> :::
> > > > Why does ext3 allow to be readonly in the status which fsck
> > > > thinks error?
>
> Is it due to errors=remount-ro or =continue?
> Will you run this test script on your ext3? On my system, the last
> remount,ro returns an error expectedly.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> # customize for your system
dev=/dev/sda1
dir=/mnt/ro_root
f=/mnt/ro_root/fileA
>
> # init
mount -o remount,rw $dir
> dd if=/dev/urandom of=$f bs=1024 count=512
> sync
> ls -li $f
mount -o remount,ro $dir
>
> # simulate rsync
> fsck -nf $dev
mount -o remount,rw $dir
> {
> dd of=/dev/null bs=1024
> sleep 5
> } < $f &
> sleep 1
> > $f.tmp
> mv $f.tmp $f
> lsof | fgrep $dir
mount -o remount,ro $dir
> fsck -nf $dev
> wait
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have no sudo - I executed it as root.
This is the output of the script:
http://pastebin.com/yq7qHxkd
I think 'is busy' is not what you wanted. Should I try it again
slightly modified?
#Marcus
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500!
Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by
optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the
Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev
