> On Monday 25 May 2015 04:55 PM, sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: >> Ritesh Raj Sarraf: >>> Anyways, in the standalone tree, there are a bunch of patches with no >>> order defined. Is it to assume that they can all be applied randomly ? >> No. >> Please refer to README file in aufs4-standalone.git. > > > Yup. That one explain. Sorry. I completely missed that file. > >>> I was hoping if we can have a standalone/dkms tree, which could build a >>> kernel module out, easily loadable in the respective kernel ?? >> Patching is neccessary (by either manually or GIT), which means you will >> need another kernel as long as debian kernel is unpatched. >> >> > > Then it may not fit in the bill of dkms. Let me check with Ben on how he > supported it for Jessie.
Did this go anywhere? I'm on Debain Testing, the recent upgrade to v4 kernel completely bricked aufs volumes on the 2 machines I use it on locally because they removed this (and where was the acceptability of such a removal discussed? Nothing comes up on a search)...
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
