On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 22:21 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 02:21:26PM +0000, Matthew Booth wrote: > > On 11/12/2010 11:24 AM, Matthew Booth wrote: > > >This patch works around what appears to be an optimization bug in gcc 4.5. > > >The > > >symptom of the bug is that dict_pos, called from dict_lookup, receives an > > >invalid value when accessing dict->used. The following ticket describes > > >the bug, > > >and includes a simple test case: > > > > I just filed a gcc BZ here: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46452 > > Boxgrinder appears to hit this bug regularly, so we are keen to get a > fix. (Unfortunately since I don't have access to EC2 I can't run the > necessary bits to see if the patch is good). > > Is there a pressing reason why we use bitfields in that struct?
Premature optimization on my part. David _______________________________________________ augeas-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/augeas-devel
