On 12/12/12 15:09, Pat Riehecky wrote: > On 08/15/2012 08:13 AM, Pat Riehecky wrote: >> On 08/14/2012 04:18 PM, Dominic Cleal wrote: >>> On 14/08/12 21:56, Pat Riehecky wrote: >>>> The attached patch /should/ successfully implement the changes you've >>>> suggested. >>> Looks spot on now - thanks for your contribution! >>> >>> I'll wait until the lens compatibility discussion has settled before >>> merging (since it changes the tree), but it'll go in before the next >>> release. There's a second Krb5 fix I've got here for #288 that'll apply >>> on top of your work. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >> Awesome, thanks for all the help!! >> >> I know the compatibility discussion is important to the future of >> Augeas, so I'll be patient. >> >> Thanks again, >> >> Pat > > Hello, > > Just a bit curious where this is at. I don't mean to be pushy. > > This patch fixes some barriers to deployment on my end. > > Thanks for making augeas awesome!
No problem, thanks for the reminder! David suggested a better solution to resolve the ambiguity, by adding in #eol nodes, which means we avoid the tree incompatibility. I've updated it and merged this, ready for the imminent release: https://github.com/hercules-team/augeas/commit/e6929626 -- Dominic Cleal Red Hat Engineering _______________________________________________ augeas-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/augeas-devel
