On 21/03/13 15:28, David Lutterkort wrote: > On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 09:15 +0000, Dominic Cleal wrote: >> It would be easiest if we stopped pushing to the Fedora repo, to prevent >> the impression that we're keeping them in sync. The web site's >> contributors and download pages will need updating too (if I can figure >> that process out). > > I'd be all for that - at this point, I think the Fedorahosted repo just > confuses things and people.
Ok, I've updated the website now so it only mentions the GitHub repo. The java-augeas bindings have also been moved to GitHub, alongside the python and ruby ones. >> The last problem might be David's GitHub repo, which has a larger set of >> forks/stars than the hercules-team org repo, plus receives PRs directly >> - ideally hercules-team would act as the upstream instead. If David's >> willing, it could be transferred to hercules-team and we replace the >> current augeas repo there. >> >> It may also be worth asking GitHub if they can help us - the web >> suggests their staff may be able to rejig the fork relationships via a >> support request. If so, David may be able to open a request to transfer >> forks/stars to the hercules-team repo from his own, then recreate his as >> a fork of hercules-team, which would make the ancestry clearer. > > Yes, I'd be more than happy to moving my repo over to ht. I'll try and > find out from Github how easy that will be. Thanks! -- Dominic Cleal Red Hat Engineering _______________________________________________ augeas-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/augeas-devel
