On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > The restriction on the available fields also seemed a little > > puzzling to me - but I suppose package maintainers are free to > > include whatever fields they like (as long as they follow the > > general file format). > > Which ones are missing? I don't think that the AUR uses any other > fields. >
What about the "source" field? -- Cédric Girard
