On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 10:36:27PM +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Wed, 04 Jun 2014 at 22:16:40, William Giokas wrote: > > [...] > > I am very much for this (and [1] is one of my mails from more than a year > > ago). I would recommend working with gitolite so that we can keep as > > much of the code we need maintained upstream, as gitolite has already > > proven its security and its efficiency. Also, it may allow other users > > to use gitolite with database backends like the AUR without using the > > AUR itself. > > > > That was our initial plan but after some investigation it turned out > that using gitolite might be much more complicated and inefficient than > writing a simple authorization script from scratch: We would need to > keep the gitolite and the AUR database in sync etc. > > See [1] for an initial implementation of a ~50 lines Python script that > does all the work.
Oh, nice. I'll have to look into this more. It looks like a lot of the work has already been started, too! Thanks, -- William Giokas | KaiSforza | http://kaictl.net/ GnuPG Key: 0x73CD09CF Fingerprint: F73F 50EF BBE2 9846 8306 E6B8 6902 06D8 73CD 09CF
pgprNLFJXYqjb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
