aur-general  

Messages by Date

• 2024/08/10 Maintainer: m3thodic packages need updating - no e-mail to contact (hidden) David C. Rankin
• 2024/08/07 Re: Package Maintainer Application - Quentin Michaud Robin Candau
• 2024/08/04 Re: Is epoch increment optional on version scheme change in -git packages? Muflone
• 2024/08/01 Re: Package Maintainer Application - Quentin Michaud Robin Candau
• 2024/07/29 Re: Package Maintainer Application - Quentin Michaud mh4ckt3mh4ckt1c4s
• 2024/07/29 Re: Is epoch increment optional on version scheme change in -git packages? oid-maps
• 2024/07/26 Re: Package Maintainer Application - Quentin Michaud kpcyrd
• 2024/07/26 Re: Package Maintainer Application - Quentin Michaud Leonidas Spyropoulos
• 2024/07/25 Re: Package Maintainer Application - Quentin Michaud Robin Candau
• 2024/07/25 Re: Package Maintainer Application - Quentin Michaud David C. Rankin
• 2024/07/25 Re: Package Maintainer Application - Quentin Michaud mh4ckt3mh4ckt1c4s
• 2024/07/25 Re: Package Maintainer Application - Quentin Michaud Robin Candau
• 2024/07/25 Re: Package Maintainer Application - Quentin Michaud Christian Hesse
• 2024/07/25 Re: Package Maintainer Application - Quentin Michaud Remi Gacogne
• 2024/07/24 Re: Package Maintainer Application - Quentin Michaud Jayesh Badwaik
• 2024/07/24 Re: Package Maintainer Application - Quentin Michaud Robin Candau
• 2024/07/24 Re: Package Maintainer Application - Quentin Michaud Robin Candau
• 2024/07/24 Re: Is epoch increment optional on version scheme change in -git packages? DodoGTA GT
• 2024/07/24 Re: Package Maintainer Application - Quentin Michaud Jayesh Badwaik
• 2024/07/24 Package Maintainer Application - Quentin Michaud mh4ckt3mh4ckt1c4s
• 2024/07/24 Re: Is epoch increment optional on version scheme change in -git packages? Brian Allred
• 2024/07/24 Re: Is epoch increment optional on version scheme change in -git packages? Bert Peters
• 2024/07/23 Is epoch increment optional on version scheme change in -git packages? dreieck
• 2024/07/13 Re: AUR Maintenance Saturday 13 July 12:00 UTC gromit
• 2024/07/13 Re: Unable to push to or clone from existing aur package repo Christian Heusel
• 2024/07/12 Re: Offensive comments Robin Candau
• 2024/07/12 Offensive comments Arne Brücher
• 2024/07/12 Houston, we have a problem Mark Wagie
• 2024/07/12 Re: Unable to push to or clone from existing aur package repo Bjoern Franke
• 2024/07/12 Re: Unable to push to or clone from existing aur package repo Dan Johansen
• 2024/07/12 Unable to push to or clone from existing aur package repo Chris Speck
• 2024/07/12 Unable to push to or clone from existing aur package repo Chris Speck
• 2024/07/11 AUR Maintenance Saturday 13 July 12:00 UTC Jelle van der Waa
• 2024/07/10 Re: hostility in the comments Christian Heusel
• 2024/07/10 Re: hostility in the comments Lex Black
• 2024/07/09 Re: hostility in the comments David C. Rankin
• 2024/07/08 Re: hostility in the comments Abraham S.A.H.
• 2024/07/08 hostility in the comments james smith
• 2024/07/06 Re: Fixing extra/python-tensorflow, which is incompatible to python-numpy 2.0 Sven-Hendrik Haase
• 2024/07/02 Fixing extra/python-tensorflow, which is incompatible to python-numpy 2.0 Claudia Pellegrino
• 2024/06/26 Re: AUR registration invalid e-mail Leonidas Spyropoulos
• 2024/06/25 AUR registration invalid e-mail Jens Hülser
• 2024/06/19 1 week break bittin Luna Jernberg
• 2024/06/18 User jiangyc reuploads Fabio Loli
• 2024/06/16 Please take actions against a problematic user Kimiblock Moe
• 2024/06/14 Re: About the intentionally duplicated package wechat-beta-bwrap and wechat-universal and unmaintained orginal package wechat-uos Kimiblock Moe
• 2024/06/12 Re: Package Maintainer application - Giovanni Harting Santiago Torres-Arias
• 2024/06/12 Re: Package Maintainer application - Giovanni Harting David Runge
• 2024/06/04 Re: Package Maintainer application - Giovanni Harting David Runge
• 2024/06/03 Re: Package Maintainer application - Giovanni Harting Giovanni Harting
• 2024/06/02 Re: User tallero comments David Runge
• 2024/06/01 Re: User tallero comments Daniel M. Capella
• 2024/06/01 User tallero comments james smith
• 2024/06/01 Re: Package Maintainer application - Giovanni Harting Christian Heusel
• 2024/05/29 Re: Package Maintainer application - Giovanni Harting Giovanni Harting
• 2024/05/28 Re: Package Maintainer application - Giovanni Harting Robin Candau
• 2024/05/27 Re: Package Maintainer application - Giovanni Harting David Runge
• 2024/05/27 Re: Package Maintainer application - Bert Peters Christian Heusel
• 2024/05/25 My pkgbuilds matt quintanilla
• 2024/05/25 Re: User TalionRanger comments Christian Heusel
• 2024/05/25 User TalionRanger comments Fabio Loli
• 2024/05/20 Re: Package Maintainer application - Giovanni Harting Jelle van der Waa
• 2024/05/20 Re: Package Maintainer application - Giovanni Harting David Runge
• 2024/05/20 Re: Package Maintainer application - Bert Peters gromit
• 2024/05/20 Package Maintainer application - Giovanni Harting Giovanni Harting
• 2024/05/18 Lost my AUR password and e-mail LDA
• 2024/05/08 Re: Kernel / utils-linux update breaks nvidia 390.xx driver dkms build - Any ideas what changed? David C. Rankin
• 2024/05/08 Re: Kernel / utils-linux update breaks nvidia 390.xx driver dkms build - Any ideas what changed? Doug Newgard
• 2024/05/08 Kernel / utils-linux update breaks nvidia 390.xx driver dkms build - Any ideas what changed? David C. Rankin
• 2024/05/08 Re: Package Maintainer application - Bert Peters Bert Peters
• 2024/05/08 Re: Package Maintainer application - Bert Peters Robin Candau
• 2024/05/07 Re: Package Maintainer application - Bert Peters kpcyrd
• 2024/05/05 Re: Removal of NicoHood as Package Maintainer due to inactivity gromit
• 2024/05/05 Re: Package Maintainer application - Bert Peters gromit
• 2024/05/05 Re: Package Maintainer application - Bert Peters Jakub Klinkovský
• 2024/05/05 Package Maintainer application - Bert Peters Bert Peters
• 2024/05/04 Re: About the intentionally duplicated package wechat-beta-bwrap and wechat-universal and unmaintained orginal package wechat-uos Kimiblock Moe
• 2024/05/04 Re: About the intentionally duplicated package wechat-beta-bwrap and wechat-universal and unmaintained orginal package wechat-uos Muflone
• 2024/05/01 Re: About the intentionally duplicated package wechat-beta-bwrap and wechat-universal and unmaintained orginal package wechat-uos Lime In a Jacket (Aaron Liu)
• 2024/04/30 Re: About the intentionally duplicated package wechat-beta-bwrap and wechat-universal and unmaintained orginal package wechat-uos Kimiblock Moe
• 2024/04/30 Re: Removal of NicoHood as Package Maintainer due to inactivity gromit
• 2024/04/29 Re: About the intentionally duplicated package wechat-beta-bwrap and wechat-universal and unmaintained orginal package wechat-uos Aaron Liu
• 2024/04/29 Re: About the intentionally duplicated package wechat-beta-bwrap and wechat-universal and unmaintained orginal package wechat-uos Muflone
• 2024/04/29 Re: About the intentionally duplicated package wechat-beta-bwrap and wechat-universal and unmaintained orginal package wechat-uos Kimiblock Moe
• 2024/04/27 Re: About user Manjusaka Robin Candau
• 2024/04/27 About user Manjusaka Fabio Loli
• 2024/04/26 Removal of NicoHood as Package Maintainer due to inactivity gromit
• 2024/04/26 Re: About the intentionally duplicated package wechat-beta-bwrap and wechat-universal and unmaintained orginal package wechat-uos Kimiblock Moe
• 2024/04/14 Re: Aarch64 package moderation policy Leonidas Spyropoulos
• 2024/04/14 Re: Aarch64 package moderation policy Carsten Haitzler
• 2024/04/14 Re: Aarch64 package moderation policy Aaron Liu
• 2024/04/14 Re: Aarch64 package moderation policy Sam Day
• 2024/04/14 Re: Aarch64 package moderation policy Lex Black
• 2024/04/14 Re: Aarch64 package moderation policy Aaron Liu
• 2024/04/14 Re: Aarch64 package moderation policy Aaron Liu
• 2024/04/14 Aarch64 package moderation policy Sam Day
• 2024/03/24 Re: Package Maintainer Application - Carl Smedstad gromit
• 2024/03/23 Re: Package Maintainer Application - Carl Smedstad gromit
• 2024/03/20 Re: Spring cleanup '24 gromit
• 2024/03/20 Re: About the intentionally duplicated package wechat-beta-bwrap and wechat-universal and unmaintained orginal package wechat-uos Lime In a Jacket (Aaron Liu)
• 2024/03/20 Re: About the intentionally duplicated package wechat-beta-bwrap and wechat-universal and unmaintained orginal package wechat-uos Kimiblock Moe
• 2024/03/19 Re: About the intentionally duplicated package wechat-beta-bwrap and wechat-universal and unmaintained orginal package wechat-uos Guoxin Pu
• 2024/03/19 Re: About the intentionally duplicated package wechat-beta-bwrap and wechat-universal and unmaintained orginal package wechat-uos Kimiblock Moe
• 2024/03/18 Re: attack on octopi and derived chain Doug Newgard
• 2024/03/18 Re: About the intentionally duplicated package wechat-beta-bwrap and wechat-universal and unmaintained orginal package wechat-uos David C. Rankin
• 2024/03/18 attack on octopi and derived chain Mat Moul
• 2024/03/18 Re: (suspension of Pellegrino Prevete) - was: removal of yuzu from the official repos gromit
• 2024/03/18 Re: (suspension of Pellegrino Prevete) - was: removal of yuzu from the official repos Lime In a Jacket (Aaron Liu)
• 2024/03/18 Re: (suspension of Pellegrino Prevete) - was: removal of yuzu from the official repos Carsten Haitzler
• 2024/03/17 Re: (suspension of Pellegrino Prevete) - was: removal of yuzu from the official repos Rein Fernhout (Levitating)
• 2024/03/17 Re: (suspension of Pellegrino Prevete) - was: removal of yuzu from the official repos Aaron Liu
• 2024/03/17 Re: Package Maintainer Application - Carl Smedstad gromit
• 2024/03/17 Re: (suspension of Pellegrino Prevete) - was: removal of yuzu from the official repos Pellegrino Prevete
• 2024/03/17 Re: (suspension of Pellegrino Prevete) - was: removal of yuzu from the official repos Pellegrino Prevete
• 2024/03/17 Re: (suspension of Pellegrino Prevete) - was: removal of yuzu from the official repos Marcell Meszaros
• 2024/03/17 Re: (suspension of Pellegrino Prevete) - was: removal of yuzu from the official repos Pellegrino Prevete
• 2024/03/17 Re: (suspension of Pellegrino Prevete) - was: removal of yuzu from the official repos Marcell Meszaros
• 2024/03/17 Re: (suspension of Pellegrino Prevete) - was: removal of yuzu from the official repos Marcell Meszaros
• 2024/03/17 Re: (suspension of Pellegrino Prevete) - was: removal of yuzu from the official repos Marcell Meszaros
• 2024/03/17 Re: (suspension of Pellegrino Prevete) - was: removal of yuzu from the official repos Pellegrino Prevete
• 2024/03/17 Re: (suspension of Pellegrino Prevete) - was: removal of yuzu from the official repos Muflone
• 2024/03/17 Re: (suspension of Pellegrino Prevete) - was: removal of yuzu from the official repos Pellegrino Prevete
• 2024/03/17 Re: (suspension of Pellegrino Prevete) - was: removal of yuzu from the official repos Pellegrino Prevete
• 2024/03/17 Re: (suspension of Pellegrino Prevete) - was: removal of yuzu from the official repos Pellegrino Prevete
• 2024/03/17 Re: (suspension of Pellegrino Prevete) - was: removal of yuzu from the official repos Pellegrino Prevete
• 2024/03/17 Re: (suspension of Pellegrino Prevete) - was: removal of yuzu from the official repos Muflone
• 2024/03/17 Re: (suspension of Pellegrino Prevete) - was: removal of yuzu from the official repos Marcell Meszaros
• 2024/03/17 Re: (suspension of Pellegrino Prevete) - was: removal of yuzu from the official repos Marcell Meszaros
• 2024/03/17 Re: (suspension of Pellegrino Prevete) - was: removal of yuzu from the official repos Pellegrino Prevete
• 2024/03/17 Re: (suspension of Pellegrino Prevete) - was: removal of yuzu from the official repos Muflone
• 2024/03/17 Re: About the intentionally duplicated package wechat-beta-bwrap and wechat-universal and unmaintained orginal package wechat-uos Lime In a Jacket (Aaron Liu)
• 2024/03/17 Re: Package Maintainer Application - Carl Smedstad Carl Smedstad
• 2024/03/17 Re: About the intentionally duplicated package wechat-beta-bwrap and wechat-universal and unmaintained orginal package wechat-uos Kimiblock Moe
• 2024/03/16 Re: About the intentionally duplicated package wechat-beta-bwrap and wechat-universal and unmaintained orginal package wechat-uos 7Ji
• 2024/03/16 Re: About the intentionally duplicated package wechat-beta-bwrap and wechat-universal and unmaintained orginal package wechat-uos Kimiblock Moe
• 2024/03/16 Re: About the intentionally duplicated package wechat-beta-bwrap and wechat-universal and unmaintained orginal package wechat-uos Aaron Liu
• 2024/03/16 Re: About the intentionally duplicated package wechat-beta-bwrap and wechat-universal and unmaintained orginal package wechat-uos Aaron Liu
• 2024/03/16 Re: Package Maintainer Application - Carl Smedstad Torsten Keßler
• 2024/03/16 Re: Question about aur package existing in git, but not visible in aur Julien Virey
• 2024/03/16 Re: Question about aur package existing in git, but not visible in aur Lime In a Jacket (Aaron Liu)
• 2024/03/16 Question about aur package existing in git, but not visible in aur Julien Virey
• 2024/03/16 Re: About the intentionally duplicated package wechat-beta-bwrap and wechat-universal and unmaintained orginal package wechat-uos Kimiblock Moe
• 2024/03/16 Re: About the intentionally duplicated package wechat-beta-bwrap and wechat-universal and unmaintained orginal package wechat-uos Guoxin Pu
• 2024/03/15 About the intentionally duplicated package wechat-beta-bwrap and wechat-universal and unmaintained orginal package wechat-uos Kimiblock Moe
• 2024/03/13 Re: How do I get an unpopular package that's needed by an existing package to extra? eNV25
• 2024/03/12 How do I get an unpopular package that's needed by an existing package to extra? Lime In a Jacket (Aaron Liu)
• 2024/03/11 Re: Package Maintainer Application - Carl Smedstad Morten Linderud
• 2024/03/11 Re: Migration of p7-tools to cahute Doug Newgard
• 2024/03/11 Re: Migration of p7-tools to cahute Lime In a Jacket (Aaron Liu)
• 2024/03/11 Migration of p7-tools to cahute Eldeberen
• 2024/03/10 Re: Package Maintainer Application - Carl Smedstad Carl Smedstad
• 2024/03/07 Re: Package Maintainer Application - Carl Smedstad Robin Candau
• 2024/03/04 Re: Removal of Super Mario Bros. from AUR Aaron Liu
• 2024/03/04 Re: removal of yuzu from the official repos Marcell Meszaros
• 2024/03/04 Re: removal of yuzu from the official repos Pellegrino Prevete
• 2024/03/04 Re: removal of yuzu from the official repos Muflone
• 2024/03/04 Re: removal of yuzu from the official repos Kusoneko
• 2024/03/04 Re: removal of yuzu from the official repos Muflone
• 2024/03/04 Re: removal of yuzu from the official repos Pellegrino Prevete
• 2024/03/04 removal of yuzu from the official repos james smith
• 2024/03/04 Re: Upgrade failure Lime In a Jacket (Aaron Liu)
• 2024/03/04 Re: Upgrade failure Abraham S.A.H.
• 2024/03/03 Re: Package Maintainer Application - Carl Smedstad gromit
• 2024/03/03 Re: Package Maintainer Application - Carl Smedstad Levente Polyak
• 2024/03/03 Package Maintainer Application - Carl Smedstad Carl Smedstad
• 2024/02/29 Re: AUR Orphan Purge Pellegrino Prevete
• 2024/02/29 AUR Orphan Purge arch
• 2024/02/21 Re: powertabeditor - request for PKGBUILD review Jonas Serych
• 2024/02/20 Re: Moving from binary to from source, can we delete bin version Aaron Liu
• 2024/02/20 Re: Is including GPG keys in an AUR package for verifying sources a good idea? David C. Rankin
• 2024/02/20 Re: Moving from binary to from source, can we delete bin version Ryan Petris
• 2024/02/20 Re: Is including GPG keys in an AUR package for verifying sources a good idea? David Runge
• 2024/02/20 Re: Moving from binary to from source, can we delete bin version Leonidas Spyropoulos
• 2024/02/20 Moving from binary to from source, can we delete bin version Mek Yt
• 2024/02/19 Re: Is including GPG keys in an AUR package for verifying sources a good idea? David C. Rankin
• 2024/02/19 Re: powertabeditor - request for PKGBUILD review Lone_Wolf
• 2024/02/19 Re: powertabeditor - request for PKGBUILD review Jonas Serych
• 2024/02/19 powertabeditor - request for PKGBUILD review Jonas Serych
• 2024/02/17 Re: Package maintainer for vinegar-git & vinegar is malicious. sewn
• 2024/02/17 Re: Package maintainer for vinegar-git & vinegar is malicious. Muflone
• 2024/02/17 Package maintainer for vinegar-git & vinegar is malicious. sewn
• 2024/02/13 Re: Is including GPG keys in an AUR package for verifying sources a good idea? mpan
• 2024/02/13 Re: Is including GPG keys in an AUR package for verifying sources a good idea? Emil Lundberg
• 2024/02/12 Re: Is including GPG keys in an AUR package for verifying sources a good idea? Abraham S.A.H.
• 2024/02/12 Re: Is including GPG keys in an AUR package for verifying sources a good idea? Abraham S.A.H.
• 2024/02/12 Re: Is including GPG keys in an AUR package for verifying sources a good idea? Wilhelm Schuster
• 2024/02/12 Re: Is including GPG keys in an AUR package for verifying sources a good idea? Wilhelm Schuster
• 2024/02/11 Re: Is including GPG keys in an AUR package for verifying sources a good idea? Aaron Liu
• 2024/02/11 Re: Is including GPG keys in an AUR package for verifying sources a good idea? Pellegrino Prevete
• 2024/02/10 Re: Is including GPG keys in an AUR package for verifying sources a good idea? mpan
• 2024/02/10 Re: tor-browser depublication and replacment Aaron Liu
• 2024/02/10 Re: Is including GPG keys in an AUR package for verifying sources a good idea? Abraham S.A.H.
• 2024/02/10 Re: tor-browser depublication and replacment Abraham S.A.H.
• 2024/02/09 Re: Is including GPG keys in an AUR package for verifying sources a good idea? LinuxSquare GMAIL
• 2024/02/09 Re: Is including GPG keys in an AUR package for verifying sources a good idea? Kusoneko
• 2024/02/09 Is including GPG keys in an AUR package for verifying sources a good idea? Wilhelm Schuster
• 2024/02/05 Re: tor-browser depublication and replacment Lone_Wolf
• 2024/02/05 Re: tor-browser depublication and replacment Christian Heusel
• 2024/02/04 Re: tor-browser depublication and replacment Kusoneko
• 2024/02/04 tor-browser depublication and replacment Zehka

• Earlier messages
• Later messages