On Tue, 20 May 2008 20:56:48 +0200 BaSh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > 2008/5/20 Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [cut] > Please see the list of packages without license(), some of these require fix > for gcc4.3 and maybe can be moved to unsupported because are > unmaintained. >
You could made a new list about it. And, sorry, in my point of view bumping pkgrel and upload a package is necessary when we're doing an important modification like changing / adding licenses. Is there anyone of us that could set-up a temporary building machine? On the point that who upload packages without a license isn't a good TU, I'm with you. -- JJDaNiMoTh - ArchLinux Trusted User
pgpecU86bfsAH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
