On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 2:53 AM, Phil Dillon-Thiselton >> I'm well confused here. We haven't "taken" anything at all, we've >> provided a link to the software. I think he thinks the tarball in that >> AUR is the source, which it isn't. I think you should ask exactly >> what he thinks we have stolen. >> > > To be clear, I've responded to the guy, but never got anything back. I > simply asked for proof of the copyright ownership.
Sounds adequate to me...and I agree with Phil, we haven't provided any software therefore I see no possibility of infringement even they do have proof of ownership. If the package were in core/extra/community then we may have a problem, but I will forever defend our right to provide a PKGBUILD regardless of license.
