okey dokey !! On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 4:21 PM, w9ya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 3:04 PM, w9ya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > So, yeah, now is the time for Aaron to consider such an approach. And > >> > IMHO > >> > it is something to consider BEFORE asking us to consider the current > >> > proposal from Allan/Lou. HECK , I can't even get Aaron to ask me for > >> > money I > >> > said I would donate. > >> > >> Why does the decision for ArchLinux to become a non-profit have ANY > >> bearing whatsoever on this proposal? It seems we're getting a little > >> cracked here. Let's all take a step back and look at what we're > >> talking about here, please > >> > >> I have more important things to do. If anyone has any serious > >> questions regarding actual facts, feel free to email me personally. > >> These mailing list posts are getting way out of hand, and frankly I > >> just don't care anymore. > > > > It has EVERYTHING to do with the current proposal, Why ? Well because you > > are having resource concerns and said you spent a bunch of money beefing > > them up. Now you were looking at code and other things that might be > done. > > Further YOU did say that efficiency was at issue, and that is ALWAYS a > > trade-off with resources, time and money. > > > > So yeah, this proposal is based on needs, and those needs are based on > > resources. And you NEED funding to continue to grow. Period. > > > > I am sorry if you feel that Arch linux can continue to grow with what > > amounts to funding from your income and time form your day. It cannot. > > Please do not send mail to me and the list. I get list mails already. >