On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 4:39 AM, bardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:32 AM, Callan Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> But if the packages are popular surely they should be in community, >> that's the point of this entire vote. I haven't seen it as putting a >> limit on actual package size. > > Right. The games problem will be greatly mitigated when generic > architecture packages will be fully supported.
Which is a whole 'nother ballgame, as the community backend scripts in no way relate to the official repo backend scripts. I am adding 'any' architecture support into the official scripts. Hopefully the community backend rewrite that some people have planned will make use of the official DB scripts, and kill 2 birds with one stone here