I maintain an package called "rudl" in unsupported. It provides ruby bindings 
to SDL, and it's a nice (more ruby-ish) alternative to ruby-sdl.

I simply called it "rudl" back then, but now I think it should be renamed 
to "ruby-rudl", following the naming scheme other ruby packages use.

If you agree, please remove it, and I'll upload a properly named package.

Henning



Reply via email to