On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 10:13:03PM +0200, Baho Utot wrote: > Ali H. Caliskan wrote: >> Well there is a difference between TU and developer, I'm not saying that >> it's not required to be good at coding and consequent about organizing a >> PGBUILD, what I'm saying is that we should embrace the enthusiasm and >> dedication by people who want to contribute and serve the community the best >> way they can. So the requirements should be much tougher as developer than >> TU. Please reconsider Jens as a TU, not as what he *is*, but what he can *be >> *. Que bono? >> >> /ali >> >> 2009/4/5 Angel Velásquez <an...@archlinux.com.ve> >> >> > Yes, I think anyone could be an asset. > > Why is the TU all about making packages/being a good packager?
It is not just about to be a good packager. But as said before, you
have the power to create binary packages and access the [community]
repository, and we need to be sure that TU's know what they do.
This is my point of view.
>
> For me I am good at making bugs, so I could never be a TU but I could be
> a TBM (trusted bug maker) :)
>
>
> [putloin]
>
--
- No manual is ever necessary.
May I politely interject here: BULLSHIT. That's the biggest Apple lie of all!
-- Discussion in comp.os.linux.misc on the intuitiveness of interfaces
pgpDjBKeinDNR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
