jre/jdk_beta should not be beta at all, last time I checked it it was the stable release.
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:04 AM, M Rawash <mraw...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 23:45 +0200, xyne wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Both of those packages (jdk and jre) are already in the community repo. > In general you shouldn't upload packages to the AUR that already exist in > core/extra/community (I think developmental versions and other variations > are permitted as long as they're properly named). > > > > Could you explain why you've created such a package? If you're trying to > achieve something specific then perhaps someone on the list can offer some > suggestions of how to proceed. > > > > Regards, > > Xyne > > jdk and jre in [community] are not updated as often as they should be > imo (currently out-of-date, again), and the only other option is > jre/jdk_beta, which are, well, beta! > > also, my package installs both jdk and jre (in the same manner as > openjdk) so users don't download the same binary package twice (a la > jre/jdk_beta) if they are unaware.. > > regards.. > >