On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 03:01:46 +0200 M Rawash <mraw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 19:57 +1930, Angel Velásquez wrote: > > > it's *not* a duplicate, i just cited the lack of updates as one > > > of the reasons i forked the package, you can review sunjdk here: > > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25303 > > > > > > regards > > > > > > > > > > IMO this is a duplicate effort, because this package provided the > > same as existent packages (jre,jdk) in repos, and btw you can't use > > the "Maintainer tag" since this isn't a binary package and you > > aren't a TU/Dev > > > > Thanks for your effort, anyway > > frankly, i'm not really sure if the Maintainer/Contributor tags > signify anything other than 'current maintainer'/'former > contributor', i didn't even know there was a debate about it.. > > cheers Don't find it in the other thread anymore, so I point it out here: Another wiki page that needs updating: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Packaging_Standards Philipp