hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:32:48 +1000
Allan McRae <al...@archlinux.org> wrote:

hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:46:48 +1000
Allan McRae <al...@archlinux.org> wrote:

Laurie Clark-Michalek wrote:
I disagree. This same thing happens to me with my package
"brasero-lite". It is brasero but without the gnome dependencies,
and has the provides=('brasero'), but when I try and install a
package that has brasero as a dependencie, such as sound-juicer,
pacman attempts to install brasero, not realising that i allready
have brasero-lite. This isn't a sound juicer fault, it is a fault
in pacman.
That is a different problem....
The brasero-lite PKGBUILD should have provides=("brasero=2.26.0")
in it.  Sound-juicer requires "brasero>=2.26.0" so just providing
brasero is not enough.

Allan

I believe this doesn't work either and the problems are at least
related.
Concrete example:
lash-git: provides=('lash=0.6.0')
calf-git: depends=('fluidsynth' 'libglade' 'lash>=0.6.0')

namcap calf-git-20090406-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz calf-git E: Dependency detected and not included (lash-git) from
files ['usr/bin/calfjackhost']
calf-git   W: Dependency included and not needed (lash)
As I said, we have two completely different problems here.  Yours is
a limitation of namcap and it would be good to file a feature request
to get it fixed.
The other "problem" is a PKGBUILD with incomplete provides
encountering a versioned dependency.  Completely different.

Allan


Allan, I still don't know how I can solve the above mentioned problem.
As you see I versioned the provides and required the version in this
case and it doesn't help.

As I see it I have the same problem here as Laurie Clark-Michalek.
I believe if this was in AUR and I tried to download calf-git through
yaourt it would try to install lash despite lash-git being installed
already.

It should not. If it does, then it is a bug in yaourt. If you have lash-git installed, then build calf-git manually using and installed it with "pacman -U <pkg>", there should be no complaints from pacman.

Allan


Reply via email to