On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 12:38:21PM +0100, Xavier wrote: > - your description is just fine, it is indeed more descriptive > - the git part should already be obvious from package name
Great, I have seen packages that include the git part in the description and other packages that do not. So I was unsure on how I would do. > Looks perfect to me after just reading it. > Maybe I wouldn't have used a scriptlet just to display this : > echo "The configuration of dvtm is done by creating a custom" > echo "config.h and (re)compiling the source code." > > I guess I would just put a comment in the pkgbuild. But it's up to > you, there is not only one way to do things :) I chose this way since one comment on the dvtm package suggested to use the dwm style (include the config.h). While checking the abs I also noted that dwm in [community] uses a scriptlet to display a similar message, but that is probably because it is in [community] and not in AUR?
