On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 3:14 AM, Panos Filip <panosfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello to everyone :) > > There seem to some Virtualbox ( or virtualbox related) packages we don't > really need: > > *1) aur/dkms-virtualbox 1.5.0-1 (Out of Date) (4) * > > *What is that exactly ?* > > *2) aur/vboxapi 3.1.2-1 (1)* > SDK for VirtualBox (Personal Use Binaries Edition) > > *That one as well ?* > > *3)aur/virtualbox_bin-1 1.6.6-1 (18)* > Powerful x86 virtualization (Personal Use Binaries Edition) > *4)aur/virtualbox_bin-2 2.2.4-1 (24)* > Powerful x86 virtualization (Personal Use Binaries Edition) > > *3 and 4 --> do some people really need older and unsupported (with less > features or buggier) releases for Virtualbox ?* > > > *5) aur/virtualbox_bin-3_0 3.0.12-1 (18)* > Powerful x86 virtualization (Personal Use Binaries Edition) > > *What about that ? --> Like 3 and 4, but different PKGBUILD for version > 3.0 and different for 3.1 ?* > > *6)aur/virtualbox_bin 3.1.2-2 [installed] (2101)* > Powerful x86 virtualization (Personal Use Binaries Edition) > > *We do want this one, it's OK* > > *7)aur/virtualbox_bin_beta 3.0.0_BETA2-1 (Out of Date) (37)* > Powerful x86 virtualization (Personal Use Binaries Edition) > > *OK, check this one ...hmm* > > > *8)aur/virtualbox_bin_unstable 3.1.4_BETA2-1 (0)* > Powerful x86 virtualization (Personal Use Binaries Edition) > > *We have one beta and one unstable (a.k.a beta) ? * > > *9)aur/virtualbox-legacy_bin 1.5.6-5 (4)* > Powerful x86 virtualization - binary version (non GPL - free for > personal use and evaluation) > > *Another one like 3 , 4 and 5 !* > > *10)aur/virtualbox-sun 3.1.2.56127-6 (45)* > A general-purpose full virtualizer for x86 hardware (Binary Edition, > Personal Use) > > *What's the difference with 6 ? * > > Regards, > > Panos Filip > Bumping the thread, since we do need some cleaning up, IMHO.