On 03/01/2010 04:14 PM, Hilton Medeiros wrote:
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 19:03:12 +0800
"arcpp....@gmail.com"<arcpp....@gmail.com> wrote:
I sent a mail to him two days ago. no response till now. Let's wait
another week.
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Ionut Biru<biru.io...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 03/01/2010 12:43 PM, arcpp....@gmail.com wrote:
These PKGBUILDs are broken.
I abandon some utilities and use many new libraries, and start to
use cmake
build system.
I need to update the Dependencies and build script.
i suggest to way actually couples of days. of the released builds
you only posted yesterday a comment.
If you really want to maintainership let the current maintainer
orphan since is actually contributing(25 febr he updated -svn one)
--
Ionut
Hello,
from what I understood, arcpp.zju is the developer of this software, not
(just) the creator of the PKGBUILD. If he can prove himself, he should
be made owner of the package ASAP... it doesn't matter if its
updated or not. If the developer wants to maintain his Arch package he
should be given priority, don't you agree?
Cheers
sure but if we stole the build from the current maintainer if wouldn't
be right. that's why is better that he ask the current maintainer about
giving it to him.
--
Ionut
