On 8 June 2010 18:02, xandry <avm-xan...@yandex.ru> wrote: > It is a pity. After all their replacement is in AUR. The following version > (stable and devel) will be on a basis xlib, that is without qt3 or qt4. > Therefore in any case all this packages will old. Including specific > languages packages. I just wont to make AUR on purer. >
Yes, you have good intentions. I am just finding it a little difficult to understand your translated sentences completely, but I get the gist. > 1. opera-china-qt3 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22757 > 2. opera-china-qt4 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24874 I can delete them only based on the fact that they are old (they have a maintainer and many votes), but someone else who uses the localised Chinese version of Opera needs to verify that these are really no longer valid. > 3. opera-dev http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18994 Many votes, not orphan. May still be used, but I am not sure. IMO this can be deleted, but I could not find any other shared qt3 dev package. > 4. opera-dev-qt4 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28123 Deleted. opera-devel supersedes this. > 5. opera-g4 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31783 Deleted. I can recall this was an impulsive upload. > 6. opera-shared-b1 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31259 Deleted. Valid but low votes, old, and confusing package name (should follow opera-unite). > 7. opera-static http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26034 Valid package. > 8. opera-unite-devel-qt3 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27321 Valid package. -- So the following packages have been removed: opera-dev-qt4 opera-g4 opera-shared-b1 And the following are candidates for removal subject to further clarification: opera-china-qt3 opera-china-qt4 opera-dev (maybe needs to be replaced with a new opera-devel-qt3?) And the following cannot be removed: opera-static opera-unite-devel-qt3 Thank you for your help in keeping the AUR clean :) -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD