On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 16:46 -0700, Dave wrote: > On 07/14/2010 04:41 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 08:58 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > >> I think it would be better to just have a "delete request" button which > >> would require a note why the package needs deleted so that the TUs could > >> have a list they can easily access and work through. > >> > >> Allan > >> > > A much better idea. For quick response we could just mail aur-general > > directly (those of us who use it). > > > > Simplest solution would probably send an email to [aur-general] with the > > comments posted and giving the user's logged-in email address. Perhaps > > it should be a 'delete/disown request' button instead, and allowed for > > all package rather than just your own. Or 'delete' when its your own and > > 'disown' when its not. > > For "disowns", I think the owner should also be e-mails so that he may > appeal the request. > > Dave
Well yes, I was assuming that the current owner would be informed automatically. In any case, whenever a reporter does not state explicitly that "I emailed X a week ago with no reply" the TUs typically ask him to do so first, so I don't see any difference with how things are previously even if the current owner is not automatically informed.
