On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:44, Nathan O <ndowens....@gmail.com> wrote: > I am not meaning a specific package, it could be a random package(s)
Huh? I quote your email here: Hey I was wondering if somebody has time to look at my packages and see if they are of quality :) So, what packages should I choose randomly from? /M > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 3:42 AM, Magnus Therning <mag...@therning.org>wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 07:00, Nathan O <ndowens....@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hey I was wondering if somebody has time to look at my packages and see if >>> they are of quality :) Some I adopted and got to add my name and email as >>> maintainer and update the quality of it. The ones with my name and email >>> are already updated. If you look you may see ndowens04 at gmail dot com or >>> ndowens04+AUR at gmail dot com I may end up adding this email to the >>> packages, I created this email address for AUR purposes so my main email >>> address doesn't get cluttered. >> >> I'm not sure I understand what you wrote above, but wouldn't it >> improve your chances of help if you actually listed the packages in >> question instead? >> >> /M >> >> -- >> Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) >> magnus@therning.org Jabber: magnus@therning.org >> http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe >> > -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus@therning.org Jabber: magnus@therning.org http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe