Excerpts from Ty John (sand_man)'s message of 2010-08-23 13:53:51 +0200: > On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 19:30 +0800, Ray Rashif wrote: > > On 23 August 2010 19:25, Ty John (sand_man) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 12:24 +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote: > > >> Excerpts from Ty John (sand_man)'s message of 2010-08-23 12:13:11 +0200: > > >> > I noticed this package is currently unmaintained. > > >> > Can I adopt this? > > >> > > >> Please do so, if you think it's still needed. > > >> I orphaned it because I lost interest in the program, but afaik in the > > >> meantime there's hardly a difference between this package and the one in > > >> [extra]. > > > > > > I can't believe I didn't see the 'adopt' button. > > > > > > Yeah I wasn't sure if it's the same or not. Does the one in extra > > > support lv2 plugins? It doesn't seem to be specifically compiled in the > > > same way. > > > I'll keep it updated for now. > > > > Yes, extra/ardour is compiled with LV2 support. The only difference > > between the two different binaries would be whatever change is > > influenced by having FFT_ANALYSIS. > > > > > > -- > > GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD > > > > I see. > FFT is an audio visualisation tool. I guess this package probably > shouldn't really be called -lv2 then.
When I created it, the [extra] package wasn't built with lv2 support (slv2 wasn't in [extra] either). It appeared sensible at the time, because lv2 support was the major difference. -- Philipp -- "Wir stehen selbst enttäuscht und sehn betroffen / Den Vorhang zu und alle Fragen offen." Bertolt Brecht, Der gute Mensch von Sezuan
