On 28 August 2010 22:32, Nicky726 <nicky...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > hope I don't get this missplaced, as a quick search didn'd get me any results. > > When I have a package, which does actually build nothing -- say wine_gecko (a > file only needs to be placed to a correct directory) -- I should only have > package() function in the PKGBUILD, is that a correct interpretation? > > Now the makepkg is happy but the AUR complaints. I can workaround that with an > empty build() function in that case the AUR is happy but the makepkg > complains. So I just put in there a harmless echo and both are happy now. > Actually my question is not that much about the correct workarounding, as it > is about if I really get the meaning of the build() and package() functions > correctly, that is for building build(), for installing package()? > > Thanx, > Nicky. >
Personally I'd use /bin/true instead of echo. However I think in this case having everything in build() is justifiable. Lukas