On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Nathan O <ndowens....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 5:31 AM, PyroPeter <abi1...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > On 09/01/2010 07:36 PM, PyroPeter wrote: > > > >> I now managed to find the developers eMail-address and take a > >> look on the code. what exactly is buggy about izulu? > >> (Apart from beeing provided as deb-packet only) > >> > >> About your PKGBUILD: > >> 1. Maintainer-comment missing > >> 2. Not all depends listed: > >> The deb depends on: wget, xmlstarlet, imagemagick, xml-twig-tools > >> Suggested: libnotify-bin > >> 3. Try to keep your PKGBUILDs readable (proper indention) > >> > >> Regards, PyroPeter > >> > > > > Izulu is now available as tarball[0]. > > With it comes a README containing the dependencies and the developers > > e-mail-address for further questions. Your PKGBUILD is still not > > indented properly, and the dependencies are incomplete. > > > > Regards, PyroPeter > > > > [0] > > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/izulu/files/izulu-0.2.5.3.tar.gz/download > > > > -- > > freenode/pyropeter "12:50 - Ich drücke Return." > > > It is now fixed, some how I guess I didn't notice the tar.gz files > They weren't there before. I was going to mess around with it, but then I saw that they only had .debs posted on their sourceforge page, I winced and thought about how much I hate working with .debs when not on a Debian system. Maybe PyroPeter sent the developer an email requesting the tarballs get posted to the SF page?