On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Evangelos Foutras <foutre...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Det <nimetonma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, please do such a thing. >> >> 1) xorg-server-gentoo (delete; unnecessary (the patches that were >> originally used with this package have all been pulled upstream over the >> years) and not being updated): >> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15089 >> >> 2) songbird-nightly (delete; unnecessary ('songbird-auto-nightly' actually >> works as it should) and not being updated): >> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13193 >> >> 3) songbird-nightly-bin (delete; unnecessary ('songbird-auto-nightly' >> actually works as it should and uses precompiled binaries) and not being >> updated): http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32932 >> >> 4) songbird-nightly-latest (delete; unnecessary ('songbird-auto-nightly' >> actually works as it should) and not being updated): >> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28885 >> >> 5) songbird-svn (delete; should replace songbird with its PKGBUILD (of >> course after changing the pkgname to just 'songbird')): >> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23968 >> >> 6) songbird (orphan/replace with 'songbird-svn'; doesn't work - >> 'songbird-svn' does. Both aren't needed since there is a separate >> 'songbird-bin' package using the precompiled binaries. This can of course be >> done the other way around too so that 'songbird' would be removed but maybe >> that shouldn't be done.. I don't know, that's why you are doing this - not >> me): http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7286 >> >> Thanks for deleting a lot of packages, >> 'Det' > > Deleted xorg-server-gentoo; will go through the songbird mess now.
I've only deleted songbird-nightly-latest, the rest seem fine to keep (i.e.: they have maintainers, were updated within a year and have enough votes).