On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Det <nimetonma...@gmail.com> wrote: > So to wrap this all up, I would just like to have an active maintainer > for that package but it's not something I really "need" since I don't > even use the package.
The maintainer of both packages appears to be active, as mentioned by Heiko in his second reply to this thread; there is no need to orphan either of them. Moreover, an update delay of a couple of weeks if perfectly fine, in my opinion; real life stuff take precedence and free time can be a very limited resource at times. Cheers.
