On Mon 20 Sep 2010 11:16 +0200, Simon Legner wrote: > do we really need three packages of the OCaml library ocamlgraph > [1]? The packages are all up-to-date, but maintained by three > different users. The correctest one according to the specified > dependencies IMHO is ocamlgraph-withoutfindlib [2], which also has > the minimal code for building the package. > What do you think?
I would think the the most correct one should be renamed to ocaml-ocamlgraph, and the rest deleted. You guys can sort that out and report back. Cheers.
