2010/12/1 Ng Oon-Ee <ngoo...@gmail.com> > On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 06:00 +0100, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > > On 01.12.2010 00:11, PyroPeter wrote: > > > On 11/30/2010 11:51 PM, Seblu wrote: > > >>> dune2 > > >>> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33037 > > >>> Broken link, and this is non-free game. > > >>> > > >> In a general way, non-free game/soft is a valid argument? > > > > > > No. Afaik even the official repositorys contain non-free software. > > > > > Indeed, rms wouldn't be happy. Anyhow, if end up discussing the ethics > > of non-free software we'll end up like Debian. Let's just let our users > > choose what they want to use as long as providing the software isn't > > illegal. > > Just to play devil's advocate, illegal according to which jurisdiction > =) > > Some things are for sure not legal in any jurisdiction...
-- Cédric Girard