On Sun 05 Dec 2010 00:44 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > On 12/05/2010 12:25 AM, Loui Chang wrote: > >http://aur.archlinux.org/trusted-user/TUbylaws.html > > > >I've noticed that there have been a few cases relatively recently where > >people don't really understand the bylaws. > > > >I'd like to encourage all Trusted Users to read over the bylaws > >periodically to make sure that they fully understand the procedures. > >Questions and clarifications are welcome on this list. > > > >If something is hard to understand, the bylaws can be revised and amended. > >If you don't agree with a certain procedure that may also be amended. > > > >Thanks for your consideration. > > because the bylaws are cryptic and i would enumerate below the logic of the > bylaws understand right now. in parentheses
Well, the biggest cryptic thing in the Bylaws are lines like: > bool SVP( motion, unsigned short discussion_period, float quorum, > unsigned short voting_period ); and > SVP( addition_of_TU, 5, 0.66, 7 ); We probably shouldn't look at TU procedure so much like a computer program. hah. I would change the SVP lines to something like: > Addition of a Trusted User: > 5 Five days of discussion > 7 Seven days of voting > 66% Sixty-six percent Quorum > This is today logic. And this time my eyes read until the end. I'm glad you figured it out. :)