17/30 does not make a 66% quorum, so yes, the motion could still fail.
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 3:07 AM, Kaiting Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Dave Reisner <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 01:39:13AM +0100, PyroPeter wrote: >> > On 12/04/2010 07:29 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: >> > >Hi, >> > > >> > >the 5 days discussion period have ended. >> > > >> > >http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=42 >> > > >> > >> > 42! >> > >> >> Yup, that's right. 42. Vote wisely, gentlemen. We may very well unfold >> the meaning of life here. >> > > This is sort of what I was talking about in my previous mail about the > refinement of the bylaws. Thirteen hours have passed since the beginning of > the voting period and at this point according to this page: > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Trusted_Users > > There are thirty Trusted Users. Seventeen yay's have been cast and a simple > majority has already been reached. We should amend the bylaws such that the > voting period may end because no amount of nay's can change the outcome of > the vote at this point. There is no reason for falconindy to wait another > seven days to receive his Trusted User privileges. --Kaiting. > > -- > Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/ >
