On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Thomas S Hatch <thatc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Isaac Dupree < > m...@isaac.cedarswampstudios.org> wrote: > >> On 01/05/11 13:55, Thomas S Hatch wrote: >> >>> If you have any questions about MooseFS feel free to ask me, it has been >>> an >>> amazing application for my company! >>> >> >> While we're asking, any thoughts about Tahoe-LAFS? - distributed, >> fault-tolerant AND with quite thought-out encryption. >> http://tahoe-lafs.org/ Googling suggests to me that it doesn't have its >> own FUSE but it is sometimes combined with sshfs (that's possible since >> Tahoe-LAFS provides an SFTP interface, among other interfaces). >> >> -Isaac >> > > Ah yes Tahoe, I didn't spend as much time with this one, but it > looks promising! In my tests MooseFS was faster and the failure support was > a bit better, I would have to really dig into my note to remember exactly > what it was that turned me off on it. > > I remember it being fairly nice though! I will have to play with it some > more! > Oh, it is lower on my list, but I wanted to make SELinux more powerful in Arch too, I am one of the VERY few who not only know how to handle SELinux, and likes to use it :)