On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Sergej Pupykin <m...@sergej.pp.ru> wrote: > At Mon, 10 Jan 2011 08:35:30 -0600, > Thomas Dziedzic <gos...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I would like to propose moving all of the orphans in [community] to >> the aur by this Friday if no one has adopted them by then. >> >> If one of your packages needs an orphan as a dependency, you must adopt it. >> >> Orphans really deserve a maintainer and I would be more comfortable >> with the package having a maintainer in the aur then being an orphan >> in [community]. >> >> Community orphans: >> http://tinyurl.com/29lp5r6 >> >> Thanks and let the discussion begin! > > There are no out-of-date orphans and there are no unassigned > bugs in community section. Is there any reason of this cleanup? >
This is more of a assigning responsibility to a package sort of thing, as I said, I would rather have it be in aur and have a maintainer then be in community and be an orphan.
